ANA Discussion Forum
Archive => Archives => Topic started by: arcteryx on June 29, 2006, 06:30:05 pm
-
I've come across many potentially biased comparisons of GK versus CK on the net. For example,
this from a GammaKnife center claiming GK is better: http://www.sdgkc.com/faqs/CyberKnife.htm. Or, this from the CKSociety implying that CK is better: http://www.cksociety.org/PatientInfo/radiosurgery_stereotactic_technology_comparisons.asp.
I was wondering if anybody has come across any academic or published papers comparing the two systems, especially in regards to outcomes/results.
Thanks!