ANA Discussion Forum

Pre-Treatment Options => Pre-Treatment Options => Topic started by: MDemisay on March 23, 2012, 11:32:44 am

Title: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: MDemisay on March 23, 2012, 11:32:44 am
Hello All,

Just wanted to confirm something as far as risks go which is better for facial issues and which form of treatment carries more risks of temporary facial paralysis?

Mike

Does anyone know?
Title: Re: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: Cheryl R on March 23, 2012, 01:53:53 pm
That also can depend on the tumor location and what damage has the tumor already done to a nerve.   So no matter what type of treatment you choose,if it already has done damage to the nerve, you can not tell which treatment might be best.                   I am sure there is a better answer to this but each dr you talk to might give you a different answer.                   Cheryl R
Title: Re: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: MDemisay on March 24, 2012, 02:52:21 pm
Cheryl,


While I appreciate your answer, it still leaves me puzzled! While I can say that I did have some reaction the first few days of November 2004 after my surgery by Dr. Sisti, when I left the hospital 3 weeks later, due to complications with ambulation, my face returned to normal. The question is should I return for Gamma or go somewhere else and take my chances?

Mike
Title: Re: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: JLR on March 25, 2012, 06:56:24 am
Hi Mike, Had CK Dec.2010. I did have facial numbness for a few months. It was temporary. It was annoying. But I knew it would go away. I did notice that my AN side is getting a bit numb again....I'm thinking it's probably just some movement of the AN on the facial nerve and will once again will go away.  Unfortunately, CK as well as GK, even surgery, isn't an easy fix. But all these symptoms/side effects of radiation are (apparently) mostly temporary.  Good luck with your decision, Joan
Title: Re: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: nftwoed on April 17, 2012, 02:45:53 pm
Hi Mike;
  Not sure, but Dr. Medberry of St. Anthony's Hospital in OKC, does both CK and GK. After reading numerous posts of his on the Cyberknife Support Forum, I really doubt an advantage of either type Tx would could be predicted.
  My feeling is 6, or a half dozen.
Title: Re: Gamma knife vs Cyber knife
Post by: Tumbleweed on April 22, 2012, 11:50:26 am
Hi, Mike:

CK generally imposes less risk to all cranial nerves compared to GK (a lot depends on tumor size and location). Because CK fractionates the radiation dosage, it gives the cranial nerves that are incidentally exposed to the radiation a chance to recover between treatments (the tumor doesn't recover as well, so the radiation impacts the AN more).

In another thread, astute forum member Paul W posted a link to recent research published by Stanford U. Medical Center (leading CK facility): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21558974

Quoting from that research abstract, in 383 patients treated with CK from 1999 to 2007 at Stanford University Medical Center, "There was no case of post-SRS [post-stereotactical radiosurgery] facial weakness. Eight patients (2%) developed trigeminal dysfunction, half of which was transient."

Best wishes,
TW