Well I am 98% certain that ck is my treatment of choice. I have treatments scheduled at both MGH and BIDMC in Boston in July and will cancel planning sessions at one facility this coming week. I've done extensive research and spoke to chief radiaton physicists, chief radiation oncolgiists and chief therapists from across the USA. Also, Phyl and Mark of ANA leadership and e-mail exchanges with some of you brought me to determine what seems best for me:
Firstly, the team at MGH is extraordinary and Dr. Loeffler is one of the most respected radiation oncologists in the universe. When speaking to experts from New York Presbyterian and Mount Sinai hospitals in NYC, Duke in NC, his name brought reverence to conversations. Stanford Medical in CA, Anderson in TX, Mayo Clinic in MN, Lahey Clinic in MA among other premier care institutions were talked with for perspectives. What's clear is that radiation options and outcomes for ANs are debatable. Specific to proton beam vs CK (my selected FSR treatment approaches), frankly it's a "wash" in terms of hearing preservation which is my #1 concern. With this information I am about to confirm with CK as it will be 5 treatments in a week's time vs 30 treatments during 4-6 weeks. Since I found no appreciable advantage of one treatment over another, I'll be going with CK. Secondarily, I believe no frame to wear in CK while this is the case with proton which also requires "bb" implants (no deal breaker but why).
Thank you ALL for your support as I drilled down to make an informed choice. Hope this may be helpful to another.