I'm alittle confused, perhaps things have changed in the past 5 years or so, or maybe differs region to region, but I knew a lady in western Canada who had a larger tumor (around 3 cm) who wanted radiation as first choice for treatment.  But the panel of Doctors stated that surgery was her only option. it wasn't a matter of her choice, but their choice for her.  As I remember it went before a board or panel of Doctors who made the decision.  I discussed with her the possibility of comming to our area (United States) for treatment. Her reply was if she did, she'd have to pay all expenses, which she couldn't afford.
By posting this, I don't mean to bash the Canadian Health System, I just confused knowing what my friend went thru.  I think "no choices" crosses the boundaries of both countries.  Maybe a Canadian member could explain.  We also watch Canadian TV ( love airfarce, or this hour has 22 minutes) but noticed commercials for health insurence coverage, in fact the person leaves thier house half dressed, stating you wouldn't leave home half dressed, why be covered by half.   If you're covered by the goverment health care, why is the added insurence needed.  I think the comercial was for Blue Cross?
Improvements are needed in both systems.  Healthcare should be a right, not a privledge.  Here in Washington State to qualify for State Health Assistence a person must be
Pregnant
Blind
62 plus years of age
or disabled
That leaves alot of cracks to fall thru.  I know during the worst of my husbands treatment time we made choices between paying $650. a month for Ins. and other bills. We had to maintain coverage while we sorted thru the outcomes.  Due to outcomes it was important that he be seen by specialists not covered by a HMO's  By the way as an added fact when I turned 56 years of age, the cost for the same insurance jumped to $965. a month based on my age only.  This was not based on usage (which I would of understood).  We had BC Premera, with a fairly large deductible ($2000.)  The above quotes of costs were for 2 adults only, no dependents. ÂÂ
It's a shame, that a person either has to rob a bank to afford coverage, or by robbing the bank and getting arrested, and placed in jail, now has medical covered.  Go figure!
OK, I'm stepping off my soap box now
Best to all
Raydean