I am guessing that the
microsurgery experience is quite different there to the
cyber knife experience.
Although my tumor dissection was well done on a very difficult and massive atypical AN by competent teaching surgeons the post op care, my many complications that resulted: to students NOT being supervised adequately nor totally versed on post operative brain swelling and CSF leaks etc... my files getting lost in the big impersonal SU system as it gets passed from one desk to the next (and not making to my lead surgeon's desk)... has left a lot to be desired... I still feel there is plenty of room for improvement in the
microsurgery area there for the treatment of AN's. I had great nurses on the neurosurgery ward but in ICU it was just dreadful. Currently I felt I was viewed more as a research specimen than a patient who needed lots of help to get back to their best potential- after the tumor was removed.
I have heard from others too that their cyberknife with Dr. Chang has been a good experience... I am happy for you that this was the case also.
One book, to me anyway, that describes my experience is
Seven Blind Mice- by Ed Young
http://www.amazon.com/Seven-Blind-Mice-Caldecott-Honor/dp/0399222618... In a figurative way it approaches the
elephant-in-the-roomAnother one that described my experience was by the famous great “DOCTORâ€...
Seuss's Daisy-Head Mayzie
http://www.amazon.com/Daisy-Head-Mayzie-Classic-Seuss-Dr/dp/0679867120This line of pertinence to me
"Dr. Eisenbart. "I think that Mayzie and her plant / Could help me get a research grant"I understand the need for research and experience for the advancement of medicine... but there needs to be work on the human element that we patients are not
specimens and
file numbers but we are PEOPLE.
It is not the Harvard, Stanford graduates etc. that impressed me the most in this, so far 3 years, journey... it is the perseverance of outstanding patients who provide these professionals with the honest and
realistic feedback of the
true outcome... not always recorded on medical records. Too me it is people such as Virginia Fickel Ehr that I hold in the
highest esteem in the advancement for better treatment for the generations
that follow- in regards to the successful treatment of acoustic neuroma tumors specifically. Praised are the medical teams that are receptive to the
honest reflective candor of patients and NOT made
defensive by it.
Remember it was active perservering patients like Ginnie who has helped to make today's better outcomes what they are today... not
just the medical professionals. She, and her friends also with this condition, had the abilty to throw the human element into their many scientific equations.... as they improved on the treatment plan with each generation.
It is my hope that medical teams, all over the globe, will receive praise for their work by experienced patients more and more...and we will read more positive posts like this one in the future. Thank you for posting.
DHM