Hi AJ;
Originally, the ANArchives were a very clever way to attempt associating a pt. driven and written website to the actual ANA in hope of giving the site archive greater respect. In several years past, I heard a couple rumors re, the archive and ANA. I'm surprised the ANA didn't claim copy right infringement!
If one reviews it carefully, however, they will find it is heavily biased toward radiation, and is written ( with the exception of carefully chosen interviews ) by AN pts.
As an NF-2 pt, I would not direct another NF-2 pt. to trust it's accuracy.
The archive originator ( Dina Goldin ) has taken pt. email from the old ANA listserve ( pre 2005 ) and altered surgical stories to make them sound scary. I email regularly with one such person today.
I wouldn't say the archive is a total wash, however, as has some truthful statements and good hints.