Hi Everyone, I am still little confused, maybe this has happened to some others @ W and W, not sure? Went to E.N.T for my yearly review of my A.N. I knew there was some growth, his thoughts were aggressive and have been aggressive as far as treatment. He went from surgery to radiation and thoughts seemed to me sound, with a great background of education and experience in this field. He explained to me that data had been changing with great levels of success for small A.N's. treated with Gamma Knife Radiation. So he emailed the Neurosurgeon on my growth and his thoughts. Went to Neurosurgeon today only to be told the slight growth, meant next to nothing and radiation was not happening any time soon. I can not understand two Doctors on the same team having two completely different opinions and can some else please explain the fact that there was growth but the Tumor was stable? I am confused, thanks . Any thoughts or answers are more than welcomed , a very frustrating day.