If you read all of this thanks for bearing with me.
What I'm looking at:
I'm a 38male, and I probably lost my ability to hear speech out of my left ear about 8 years ago. I had no insurance until the beginning of this year, so I never got the AN confirmed until now. I have no other symptoms that next to no hearing in my left ear. I got an mri and the AN is 42mm... the two sets of ENT/neurosurgeons have said it needs surgery, probably two sets of it. An initial retrosigmoid, to probably get out most of it, if not all. And then a possible second surgery after the swelling goes down to maybe get the last bit thats near the facial motor nerve. The surgery is scheduled about 4 weeks out. Clinical balance and facial nerve tests show they are affected minimally. Which makes me hopeful that surgery would result in minimal facial paralysis, but likely large balance issues.
What I don't know
I don't know what makes the neuroma grow. I know the fibrowhatever genetic disorder can make it more likely. But I don't understand the nature of the tumour. How is it different than the nerve itself? What is growing that is not supposed to be growing? How is that affecting the acoustic nerve negatively? Why can't the signals from my ear still reach my brain?
Can the neuroma shrink on its own? How often does that happen? Is there any evidence to show why that might happen? (Like a certain diet?) Can I cut sugar and increase antioxidants and superfoods and mushrooms, etc, etc and that might make it shrink? If it did shrink, could my hearing improve?
I don't know what exactly happens in the surgery. I imagine it being partly exploratory/the surgeon seeing kinda how the neuroma is touching things. I image the surgeon will try to carefully get most of the mass of the neuroma out and leave the more delicate work until the end or for the next surgery, especially if the surgery is taking a long time. I'm not exactly sure what makes it take more or less time.
Could there be better options if I waited? IE) Could there be development where the tumour is partly removed and I get a cochlear implant and my hearing gets better? Or something like that? Why isn't that an option for me now?
I don't know the probablity of recovery without complications./The probability of each complication and its severity. (which can't be known, and thats aggravating)
My surgeon has taken out 2500 acoustic neuromas. But I don't know how knowledgable my surgeon is about alterntives. I realize 42mm is "giant", but logically something besides surgery could make it smaller, but that is not knowledge my surgeon is going to be invested in. 2500 surgeries pays for alot of nice things. I'm not saying he's out to sham me. Just that I've lived amongst people in the medical field all my life, and I know money is what makes it go round. And there are good and bad doctors and just because you've done 2500 acoustic neuromas doesn't mean removing those 2500 acoustic neuromas was what was best for those 2500 patients.
What I'd like help with
Whether or not there is sensible alternative to the surgery.
Knowledge about acoustic neuromas. (what they are, how they grow, how they might shrink, why they affect your cochlear nerver and facial motor nerve? negative.
For a 42mm neuroma could there a better medical option than just retrosigmoid taking it out? Why isn't a cochlear implant an option?