Hi Sherry,
Just read your recent post and figured I'd chime in.
Like you, I've opted for radio surgery (my AN is now 1cm x 9mm x 4mm). Like you, for me to weigh out GK vs. CK was VERY heavy on my mind. I know both are viable options and for me, it boiled down to a few factors (of course, everyone is different in their reasoning for their decisions).
1. Accuracy: the data supporting the accuracy/pin-pointing of the growth was key for me. As my AN is still in the IAC, this was of utmost importance to me. Both treatments work for my situation, one accuracy was better than another
2. Headframe: I hear you on that one. But, in speaking with my neurosurgeon (hell, she didn't want to cut me! Unheardof!). She did her internship in GK. She shared with me the headframe but all in all, it was not a major factor for me. The outcome of the treatment is what mattered, so I viewed the headframe as a "temporary discomfort" for a 1 dose treatment as the long term outcome was the importance.
3. Single dose vs FSR: For me, either worked. Like you, I live a VERY hectic lifestyle (45, single income, with dog, works wayyyyyyyyyyyy too much, blah blah blah). This, to me, is an individual decision as both are proven to work fine.
4. Efficacy: GK has much more data to show it's a viable, proven treatment. CK doesn't have the longevity of data but the data available is definately impressive.
So, all in all, I did quite a bit of research over all of these past months, met with soooo many medical professionals, discussed with surgical and radio-surgery patients, family, friends, etc. Both treatments work. We can only hope that outcomes are positive all the way around but can't lose sight of reality either. ÂÂ
OH, I can relate to your concerns but you know what is best for you. Said many times around here, go with your gut... and we'll keep feeding you chocolate to help the cause (and the nerves) as you deal with what you have to deal with. Great place here... seems we all know the feeling, ya know?
Hang tough!
Phyllis