It seems like I'm always the one on the Forum asking the hard questions, but I can't let this pass - and I love playing Devil's Advocate
Why is this whole idea of giving patients preventative meds prior to their surgery something that House does? Do they have a need for this because their patients have a higher incidence of this infection? I know they have a boat load of AN patients, but I don't think the incidence of viral infection post op is THAT great.
Do places other than House follow this protocol? Or are they unique in this? And if so, why?
I'm with Eli - don't give me something unless you find out I need it. It's like the vicodin the docs tried to pass off on me after I had my twins. It was just like "here, take this". I had no need for it, I didn't take it - I had a tylenol and in reality didn't even need that. This has happened to me in other situations also - docs trying to push meds I didn't need.
I remember asking my neurotologist if I should take some kind of antibiotic prior to my BAHA surgery. He was puzzled by the question and asked why I felt I needed it. I cited infection - shouldn't we be preventing it?? His response was, if you get an infection, I'll prescribe an antiobiotic. It turned out to be a great answer - I never got an infection; I never had to take the meds unnecessarily. Definitely my kind of doctor!
Just my thoughts on this subject,
Jan