Pat .....
Really do not want to add any stress to you or your situation, but here is what happened to me.
I had retrosigmoid approach surgery to remove my 2.6 cm AN three years ago. My neurosurgeon told me that he believed (see what Jan said) he had removed it completely. At the six months post-op MRI, there was an area of enhancement (no size given) that the doctor convinced me was most likely scar tissue. At the one-year MRI, again an area of enhancement (no size given) ..... this time the radiologist stated consistent with residual tumor or scar tissue ..... surgeon still felt it was most likely scar tissue since it had not changed. At the two-year MRI, read as "stable MRI." At the three-year MRI, the report stated nothing about scar tissue, calling it recurrent acoustic neuroma measuring 1.3 cm. My neurosurgeon agreed now that it was a recurring tumor. With a second opinion, looking at the past three MRIs they felt it had grown 3 mm since the MRI in February, 2010. (Average growth rate of ANs is 1-2 mm per year). I am now scheduled for hopefully total removal this time via translab approach, which of course, will take the remainder of my hearing ..... but hopefully getting the BAHA abutment at the same time.
From my research, retrosigmoid approach surgeries have the highest incidence of regrowth and still with that approach there is only a 5 to 9% chance that the remaining piece/cells will begin growing again. Jan is right that overall with all approaches, there is only a 1 to 2% chance of regrowth.
Try to remain calm until Tuesday and do not be too hard on the doctor or PA. Sometimes it is extremely difficult to tell scar tissue from residual tumor until (or if) it begins growing. Most never do.
Many thoughts and prayers. Clarice