It's interesting that 3cm seems to be the cutoff point for radiosurgey, but the major centers appear to discourage radiation treatment even as the measurements approach that point. My AN actually measured 2.9cm, but most radiosurgeons and all neurosurgeons that I spoke recommended debulking or complete resection.
In my opinion, it's a shame since single-sided deafness is almost a guarantee for all ANs above 2.5cm whereas radiosurgery stands a much better chance at saving hearing. I see that some people in the posts (above) were directed towards surgery also (in the major centers, at least). I figured if the doctors at Stanford, JH, Barrows, and MGH were all saying having surgery first, then I should listen to them. However, after reading some amazing outcomes here (e.g., from RamAir and CC), I'm beginning to question their decision.