Thanks.
Since everyone is an advocate of second opinions, can someone tell me exactly what I would be getting a second opinion on here? I genuinely am interested.
Would the second opinion be that my tumor may in fact not be a tumor nor an acoustic neuroma? If so, then yes, I agree, I should get a second opinion. I will prepare my results and send them to the House Clinic, and that should confirm that it is an acoustic neuroma or not (seeing as though I will have my neurosurgeon diagnose it as an AN plus my neurotologist--so that's two professionals already). But I in no way want to travel to get brain surgery to be far away from my friends, family, and dog--that is the one thing I will not sacrifice. AND I cannot afford that AT ALL. So actually going anywhere else but Orlando, Florida, is not an option.
So that brings me back to getting a second opinion on the actual people performing the surgeries. And while two people on here may not feel comfortable with the fact that my doctor made an off-the-cuff, trying-to-calm-me statement about the surgery being like Algebra I, it did not bother me whatsoever. I do not think the doctor minimized the surgery in any way during my visit. He was very real with me. The comment about it being like Math was something he said while we were leaving--it wasn't the way he presented the surgery. Him saying that is VERY relative. Just because one surgeon thinks something is the most complicated surgery ever does not mean that a good surgeon HAS to agree. I hate to compare surgery to my job, which is professional writing, but let me make the comparison: Where I work (a large financial industry), the majority of people think writing an essay, even on something on which they are an expert, is one of the HARDEST tasks that they will ever have to do. I, on the other hand, think it's way easier than, say, Algebra I, which is actually very challenging for me.
We all know that the size of my tumor does not make it a candidate for radiation. The only option I have is surgery. Since I know Dr. Field is very experienced in removing acoustic neuromas (yes, I specifically asked him how many acoustic neuroma surgeries he's done--not just brain surgeries--and, in fact, he has been doing them for a LONG time--I found a post from years ago on here from someone who highly recommends him) and does so with a team, including a neurotologist, and also is part of ANA, I do feel he is qualified enough. I will get the free second opinions from the famous teams who are known for this surgery in the United States, but I do not see that, if they still believe surgery is necessary (which I'm sure it still will be), making me change my mind about the neurosurgeon, even if I have only seen ONE neurosurgeon and ONE neurotologist.