the consensus is in: both dr. miller at house and dr. friedman at usc agree (for various reasons) that translab is the best option for my son due to his youth and the size of the tumor. my prior research indicated this would be exactly the case (and i'd already mentally rejected radiation, retro, and middle fossa on my own, just based on my own non-medical interpretations of nik's case vs their risks), so i can't say i'm surprised, and i'm not at all questioning the recommendation. out of a sea of awful choices, it seems like the most-correct awful choice in his specific case.
but here's my question:
dr. miller, who was awesome on the phone, but who is new, does not work with dr. schwartz, and the latter is the neurosurgeon i want on the case. i'm not entirely sure how to handle this, so if anyone has any tips, please advise.
with respect to dr. friedman, although i intend to consult with him live, i have to admit i was a little put off by the fact that he spent more time 'selling' me on usc (specifically usc vs. house - was there bad blood in his departure?) - and in fact, that was not only his opening, but his closing - than explaining the reasoning behind his recommendations. in fact, i had to prod him when he said 'so i think microsurgery is the way to go,' asking which specific type he was recommending. only then did he get into it. between that and phrases like, 'we do the highest volume with the least complications' and 'i spent 15 years at house, and they're good, but we have something special here at usc,' it felt like he was trying to 'win the business'. and not simply 'win' it, but 'win' it from house specifically. it was off-putting.
bear in mind i hadn't even MENTIONED i was consulting with house (much less that i had already spoken with them). so it just left me a bit unnerved. but his reputation precedes him and i'm not going to discount a renowned physician based on a single phone call, so i still intend to consult.
but the usc team is already in place, so i'm more questioning how to go about getting a different consult from house if i'm in the end not quite sure about dr miller. i could very well end up preferring her anyway, and suspect i will, but i'd like to talk to others, and am not sure how to do that now that she's already the one who reviewed my son's case.
thoughts? (thank you in advance.)