Have read recently some negative results on longer term gladolinium effects (I'll try and grab the study article at home and update the post) that summarizes by saying that the gladolinium seems to collect in the body over time and repeated doses. They don't indicate any side effect from this but not sure I want to continue to pack that in there.
Does anyone in the W/W have follow up MRI without contrast or with another contrast material? Thanks....
I'm in the observation group, for almost 1.5 years now, and I've had three MRIs so far. The first, the diagnostic one, was done with contrast. The second was also done with contrast. For the third I switched to no contrast and the images are fine for measuring size. The fourth is booked for the end of this month and I've specified no contrast and to also include in the suite of MRI images.
* t2_tse_fs-dixon_cor_F (coronal view)
* t2_tse_fs-dixon_ax_F (axial view)
* t2_space_tra_iso (0.5 mm slices axial)
The key thing I think is to get some T2-weighted images with fast spin echo/turbo spin echo. The operator of the MRI will hopefully know which settings to use to get a decent image suitable for size measurement. I've had all my imaging done using a 1.5T (Tesla) machine. Again, the images I've had without contrast are suitable for size measurement, which is all I'm after at this stage. I also do the measurements myself and have the results the same morning the MRI is done and then see what the radiologist reports.
I don't like the idea of a heavy metal, even if it is chelated, being injected into my body. Wish I knew this at the time of my second MRI, but at that state all I was interested in was, did it grow significantly (which it didn't).
If there are any radiologist that can give good generic MRI settings for checking on size, I'd love to hear them. As I think many others would.
My algorithm for MRI imaging is to get the first (diagnostic) MRI done with gadolinium contrast agent and then to switch to the appropriate T2 weighted image from then on.