My mri with contrast is in 2 days but with further thinking and weighing the pros and cons I have come to the conclusion that maybe the contrast is too much of a risk and not worth doing.
There have been countless studies and research since 2014 showing that gadolinium contrast dye doesn't actually fully leave the body after injection and there are chemical metals that remain in your brain and tissues, and doctors are unsure how bad this is for health as they need more resaerch. This is why radiologists are so reluctant to give contrast nowadays because they do not want to be liable for a contrast injection related injury or Contrast Retention
so with this in mind, I have also know I do not have a Large tumor because it would of shown up on the inital CT scan and MRI Without contrast.
So that leaves in the very slim chance that i do have AN, it is very small and will only show up with contrast dye,
Which I have also recognized getting surgery to remove it 99.9% chance you will lose hearing in that ear (Is this correct or are the odds better?)
And thus the doctors will simply just tell me to do nothing about it and wait.
So AN or not I don't think would change anything because they would simply not do any surgery or anything about it and i would be Wait and watch status
Is it reasonable for me to weigh the pros and cons and come to the conclusion that not getting the Contrast injection because of the unknown risks of Contrast Retention is a viable choice?
https://www.itnonline.com/article/debate-over-gadolinium-mri-contrast-toxicity