Hi DodgeAU!
Thank you for your quick response! I certainly understand your reluctance and anxiety about the head frame. From what I have read, that is actually the worst part of the GK procedure, but I am told that it really isn't as bad as it sounds. But then I have not experienced it either.
I do not know what is available in Australia, but CyberKnife has used a mask instead of a head frame for years. And some people have gone to CK for that very reason. So, the makers of Gamma Knife have noticed that and have that as an option on their latest model of the GK. I have had a consultation with a neurosurgeon at Emory University hospital in Atlanta, and he told me that if I have the procedure done there, they have the latest model of the Gamma Knife which I believe is the ICON, and I would have the mask, not the headframe. You have to used the headframe with the previous model, the Perfexion, and the other previous models of the Gamma Knife.
The other place I am considering uses the headframe, and the reason they state for doing it rather than using the mask is that they have wonderful results with the headframe which holds the patients heads perfectly for them. Using the mask allows a tiny bit of movement. The CyberKnife accounts for that, and I'm assuming the GK Icon does, too, but the other hospital does not want to introduce a new possibility for movement when they have had great success with the headframe.
So that is how I understand the two options for the GK at this time. Maybe someone who knows more or has experienced more can shed further light on it.
And again, my dilemma is do I go with Emory which uses the mask with the GK Icon, or do I go with the tried and true headframe which would not allow the slightest movement? I am still trying to decide, but my AN is small like yours was, so I have time to decide.