I found James interesting, and that there was not enough about him. He started out as a stereotype playboy of some sort. I guess not revealing the letters for so long kept him in that status for much of the book, though he changed pretty soon after leaving Georgia. That makes her not reading the letters in the first place kind of mean, don't you think? This will get me in trouble, no doubt, but it seemed like Georgia falling for James in the first place was kind of typical "bad boy love," if that means anything. She had no basis for thinking he was all set to settle down and raise a family - she just sort of assumed that. Not that I am a fan of playboy types, but if that is what they are, the whole "I can change him when we get married" idea seems lame to me. I didn't see any evidence that James misrepresented his intentions to her.
Okay, I think I've dug the whole deep enough for now...
Steve