Heck, I just replied to the reply. That'll teach me not to look at the date(s) of the entire thread first.. It's still a worthwhile discussion to have. Given that researchers have their own bias (to the institution that employs them) built in, I doubt that one could find a broad study encompassing patients from numerous institutions as is suggested. It surely would be useful to those considering their options and places, but I submit that it would be hard to find because the researcher is more concerned with report his own instituitions successes (and sometimes failures) than other institutions.
That's one of the reasons that this forum is so unique and great. People from all over the country and all over the world can share their experiences with procedures, doctors, facilities, remedies, etc.. So, we all are somewhat of a statistic group even if we're somewhat skewed by the population that visits and contributes. As has been said by Jim before, MANY of those diagnosed and treated and have wonderful outcomes never come back after treatment. There is only a handfull of those here. That alone would skew "our numbers" into appearing less than positive.
Admittedly, when I first looked at the forum, it scared the d***ens out of me. I saw just a few regulars with minimal "complications" and lot of people with them. To me, that said that the chances of permanent complications was very high. Over time, I have come to realize that my chances of permanent complications was much lower than that because there are so many that get treatment and then have no need for this forum any longer. I chose to stay, in part, because I wanted others weiging their options for treatment that not EVERY surgery ends with permanent "complications". You can have a successful outcome from surgery and eventually get back to a normal, happy, physically active lifestyle.
I've read before that "successful outcome" for a doctor / surgeon / radiation oncologist is very different than "successful outcome" for the patient. To a person with permanent facial palsy they are much less likely to call it a "success" than the surgeon that treated them. To the surgeon, if most or all of the tumor is removed and the patient lived through it, then it's a "success".
I could go on and on but you get my point. Jan, Kay, Phyl, Jim, Steve, Debbi, JohnnyDiaz, Marci, etc.. can, in my book, be regarded as the beacon of light on the hill for those that have just gotten the dreadful news that we all got as "success" stories. I think the more of us that stay around after treatment (or during watch and wait) and show that "success" is not what the doctor considers it such but what make of life after treatment, the more we can skew the numbers to be more reflective of true life.
Okay, I'll parachute (again) off my soapbox.. *WHEEEE!*
Regards,
Brian